You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utility of routine exercise treadmill testing early after percutaneous coronary intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2261-7-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohan N Babapulle, Jean G Diodati, James C Blankenship, Thao Huynh, Sabrina Cugno, Radha Puri, Phuong A Nguyen, Mark J Eisenberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#433
of 1,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,376
of 77,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.