↓ Skip to main content

Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Xin Liew, Jocelyn Teo, Irene Ai-Ling Too, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Ngan, Ai Ling Tan, Maciej Piotr Chlebicki, Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa, Winnie Lee

Abstract

Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are colonized. Clinical data and fungal surveillance cultures in 28 patients were recorded from November 2010, and January to February 2011. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, micafungin, caspofungin and anidulafungin were tested via Etest. The utilities of BDG, Candida score and colonization index for candidiasis diagnosis were compared via ROC. 30 BDG assays were performed in 28 patients. Four assay cases had concurrent colonization and infection; 23 had concurrent colonization and no infection; three had no concurrent colonization and infection. Of 136 surveillance swabs, 52 (38.24 %) were positive for Candida spp, with C. albicans being the commonest. Azole resistance was detected in C. albicans (7 %). C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were, respectively, 100 and 7 % SDD to fluconazole. All 3 tests showed high sensitivity of 75-100 % but poor specificity ranging 15.38-38.46 %. BDG performed the best (AUC of 0.89). Despite that positive BDG is common in surgical patients with Candida spp colonization, BDG performed the best when compared to CI and CS.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,231,577
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,774
of 7,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,284
of 262,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#61
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.