↓ Skip to main content

Two-year assessment of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Post hoc analysis of the ASSET-K study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-year assessment of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Post hoc analysis of the ASSET-K study
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12902-015-0033-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichi Umezawa, Akira Kubota, Hajime Maeda, Akira Kanamori, Kiyokazu Matoba, Yasuyuki Jin, Fuyuki Minagawa, Mitsuo Obana, Kotaro Iemitsu, Shogo Ito, Hikaru Amamiya, Mizuki Kaneshiro, Masahiko Takai, Hideaki Kaneshige, Kazuhiko Hoshino, Masashi Ishikawa, Nobuaki Minami, Tetsuro Takuma, Nobuo Sasai, Sachio Aoyagi, Takehiro Kawata, Atsuko Mokubo, Yukiko Miyairi, Hiroshi Takeda, Shin Honda, Hideo Machimura, Tetsuya Motomiya, Manabu Waseda, Yoshikazu Naka, Yasushi Tanaka, Yasuo Terauchi, Ikuro Matsuba

Abstract

There have only been a few reports about use of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), suggesting that the safety of these agents has not been sufficiently demonstrated. We performed a comparative review of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin for Japanese patients with T2DM managed in the real-world clinical setting. An age-stratified analysis was performed of 831 patients who were treated with sitagliptin for 2 years. Parameters assessed included the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, serum creatinine, and adverse events. HbA1c and the incidence of hypoglycemia were also evaluated in patients treated with sitagliptin and a sulfonylurea (SU), who were divided into three age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years). Comparison of glycemic control parameters, laboratory values, and adverse events revealed significant improvement of HbA1c, casual postprandial plasma glucose, and fasting plasma glucose in each age group with no change in body weight. Serum creatinine increased significantly in all age groups. Hypoglycemia only occurred in patients who received combined treatment with an SU and sitagliptin, and there was no age-related difference in its incidence. HbA1c was improved by 2 years of sitagliptin therapy in all three age groups, and age did not seem to influence the incidence of hypoglycemic events. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in patients ≥ 75 years old, suggesting that it is also useful for treating elderly patients with T2DM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,363,602
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#289
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,346
of 265,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.