↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacomicrobiomics: exploiting the drug-microbiota interactions in anticancer therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacomicrobiomics: exploiting the drug-microbiota interactions in anticancer therapies
Published in
Microbiome, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40168-018-0483-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Concetta Panebianco, Angelo Andriulli, Valerio Pazienza

Abstract

Cancer is a major health burden worldwide, and despite continuous advances in medical therapies, resistance to standard drugs and adverse effects still represent an important cause of therapeutic failure. There is a growing evidence that gut bacteria can affect the response to chemo- and immunotherapeutic drugs by modulating either efficacy or toxicity. Moreover, intratumor bacteria have been shown to modulate chemotherapy response. At the same time, anticancer treatments themselves significantly affect the microbiota composition, thus disrupting homeostasis and exacerbating discomfort to the patient. Here, we review the existing knowledge concerning the role of the microbiota in mediating chemo- and immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity and the ability of these therapeutic options to trigger dysbiotic condition contributing to the severity of side effects. In addition, we discuss the use of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and antibiotics as emerging strategies for manipulating the microbiota in order to improve therapeutic outcome or at least ensure patients a better quality of life all along of anticancer treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 338 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 116 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 124 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#974,722
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#272
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,052
of 344,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#14
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.