You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-8-118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mika Inukai, Mike T John, Yoshimasa Igarashi, Kazuyoshi Baba |
| Abstract |
One of the most immediate and important functional consequences of many oral disorders is a reduction in chewing ability. The ability to chew is not only an important dimension of oral health, but is increasingly recognized as being associated with general health status. Whether perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) are correlated to a similar degree in patient populations has been less investigated. The aim of this study was to examine whether perceived chewing ability was related to OHRQoL in partially dentate patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2011.
All research outputs
#20,148,663
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,969
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,844
of 99,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.