You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A qualitative evaluation of volunteers' experiences in a phase I/II HIV vaccine trial in Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-283 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edith AM Tarimo, Anna Thorson, Thecla W Kohi, Muhammad Bakari, Eric Sandstrom, Fred Mhalu, Asli Kulane |
Abstract |
Evaluating experiences of volunteers in an HIV vaccine trial will be useful for the conduct of future trials. The purpose of this study among volunteers who participated in a phase I/II HIV vaccine trial in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania was to assess what characterized their experiences during the trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 20 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#14,138,735
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,738
of 7,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,154
of 140,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#53
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.