Title |
The effect of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Bangladesh: does coverage matter? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-208 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tanja AJ Houweling, Kishwar Azad, Layla Younes, Abdul Kuddus, Sanjit Shaha, Bedowra Haq, Tasmin Nahar, James Beard, Edward F Fottrell, Audrey Prost, Anthony Costello, the PCP study team |
Abstract |
Progress on neonatal survival has been slow in most countries. While there is evidence on what works to reduce newborn mortality, there is limited knowledge on how to deliver interventions effectively when health systems are weak. Cluster randomized trials have shown strong reductions in neonatal mortality using community mobilisation with women's groups in rural Nepal and India. A similar trial in Bangladesh showed no impact. A main hypothesis is that this negative finding is due to the much lower coverage of women's groups in the intervention population in Bangladesh compared to India and Nepal. For evidence-based policy making it is important to examine if women's group coverage is a main determinant of their impact. The study aims to test the effect on newborn and maternal health outcomes of a participatory women's group intervention with a high population coverage of women's groups. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |