↓ Skip to main content

Tumor necrosis factor-α enhances voltage-gated Na+ currents in primary culture of mouse cortical neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor necrosis factor-α enhances voltage-gated Na+ currents in primary culture of mouse cortical neurons
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12974-015-0349-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiqiang Chen, Jiangtao Sheng, Jingfang Guo, Fenfei Gao, Xiangfeng Zhao, Jianping Dai, Gefei Wang, Kangsheng Li

Abstract

Previous studies showed that TNF-α could activate voltage-gated Na(+) channels (VGSCs) in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Since TNF-α is implicated in many central nervous system (CNS) diseases, we examined potential effects of TNF-α on VGSCs in the CNS. Effects of TNF-α (1-1000 pg/mL, for 4-48 h) on VGSC currents were examined using whole-cell voltage clamp and current clamp techniques in primary culture of mouse cortical neurons. Expression of Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3, and Nav1.6 were examined at both the mRNA and protein levels, prior to and after TNF-α exposure. TNF-α increased Na(+) currents by accelerating the activation of VGSCs. The threshold for action potential (AP) was decreased and firing rate were increased. VGSCs were up-regulated at both the mRNA and protein levels. The observed effects of TNF-α on Na(+) currents were inhibited by pre-incubation with the NF-κB inhibitor BAY 11-7082 (1 μM) or the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) inhibitor SB203582 (1 μM). TNF-α increases Na(+) currents by accelerating the channel activation as well as increasing the expression of VGSCs in a mechanism dependent upon NF-κB and p38 MAPK signal pathways in CNS neurons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,694
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2,069
of 2,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,300
of 263,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#38
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.