You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Physical Rehabilitation Core Outcomes In Critical illness (PRACTICE): protocol for development of a core outcome set
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-2678-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bronwen Connolly, Linda Denehy, Nicholas Hart, Natalie Pattison, Paula Williamson, Bronagh Blackwood |
| Abstract |
Existing data on physical rehabilitation interventions in critical illness are challenged by outcome heterogeneity that limits data synthesis and translation of research findings into clinical practice. This protocol describes the PRACTICE study to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials of physical rehabilitation interventions delivered across the continuum of a patient's recovery from the intensive care unit until reintegration in the community following hospital discharge. Mixed methods will be used including: systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative literature; qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers; a modified Delphi consensus process with researcher, clinician and patient/caregiver stakeholder groups; and consensus meetings for ratification of findings, resolving uncertainty, or developing an action plan for COS implementation. The PRACTICE COS will inform relevant stakeholders about important outcomes regarding physical rehabilitation in critical illness, and may enhance the future design and conduct of trials in this area. COMET database ( www.comet-initiative.org/ , Record ID 288, 01/03/13). PROSPERO database ( CRD42014008908 , CRD42017078549 ). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |