↓ Skip to main content

Flavivirus NS3 and NS5 proteins interaction network: a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screen

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flavivirus NS3 and NS5 proteins interaction network: a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screen
Published in
BMC Microbiology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-11-234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Le Breton, Laurène Meyniel-Schicklin, Alexandre Deloire, Bruno Coutard, Bruno Canard, Xavier de Lamballerie, Patrice Andre, Chantal Rabourdin-Combe, Vincent Lotteau, Nathalie Davoust

Abstract

The genus Flavivirus encompasses more than 50 distinct species of arthropod-borne viruses, including several major human pathogens, such as West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, Japanese encephalitis virus and the four serotypes of dengue viruses (DENV type 1-4). Each year, flaviviruses cause more than 100 million infections worldwide, some of which lead to life-threatening conditions such as encephalitis or haemorrhagic fever. Among the viral proteins, NS3 and NS5 proteins constitute the major enzymatic components of the viral replication complex and are essential to the flavivirus life cycle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 29%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 5%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 22 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,375,523
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#705
of 3,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,654
of 139,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.