↓ Skip to main content

Exosomes in cancer: small particle, big player

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
636 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
731 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exosomes in cancer: small particle, big player
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13045-015-0181-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Zhang, Xiao Yuan, Hui Shi, Lijun Wu, Hui Qian, Wenrong Xu

Abstract

Exosomes have emerged as a novel mode of intercellular communication. Exosomes can shuttle bioactive molecules including proteins, DNA, mRNA, as well as non-coding RNAs from one cell to another, leading to the exchange of genetic information and reprogramming of the recipient cells. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor cells release excessive amount of exosomes, which may influence tumor initiation, growth, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. In addition, exosomes transfer message from tumor cells to immune cells and stromal cells, contributing to the escape from immune surveillance and the formation of tumor niche. In this review, we highlight the recent advances in the biology of exosomes as cancer communicasomes. We review the multifaceted roles of exosomes, the small secreted particles, in communicating with other cells within tumor microenvironment. Given that exosomes are cell type specific, stable, and accessible from body fluids, exosomes may provide promising biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and represent new targets for cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 731 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 718 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 20%
Student > Master 106 15%
Researcher 91 12%
Student > Bachelor 86 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 148 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 207 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 10%
Engineering 31 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 4%
Other 96 13%
Unknown 174 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,652,156
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#378
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,026
of 262,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.