↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of Caenorhabditis elegans across 1.5 years in selected North German locations: the importance of substrate type, abiotic parameters, and Caenorhabditis competitors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prevalence of Caenorhabditis elegans across 1.5 years in selected North German locations: the importance of substrate type, abiotic parameters, and Caenorhabditis competitors
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-14-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carola Petersen, Philipp Dirksen, Swantje Prahl, Eike Andreas Strathmann, Hinrich Schulenburg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 29%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 29%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,227
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,829
of 322,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.