↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of infection control in health facilities in Arua district, Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of infection control in health facilities in Arua district, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-0999-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Wasswa, Christine K. Nalwadda, Esther Buregyeya, Sheba N. Gitta, Patrick Anguzu, Fred Nuwaha

Abstract

At least 1.4 million people are affected globally by nosocomial infections at any one time, the vast majority of these occurring in low-income countries. Most of these infections can be prevented by adopting inexpensive infection prevention and control measures such as hand washing. We assessed the implementation of infection control in health facilities and determined predictors of hand washing among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Arua district, Uganda. We interviewed 202 HCWs that included 186 randomly selected and 16 purposively selected key informants in this cross-sectional study. We also conducted observations in 32 health facilities for compliance with infection control measures and availability of relevant supplies for their implementation. Quantitative data underwent descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regressions at 95 % confidence interval while qualitative data was coded and thematically analysed. Most respondents (95/186, 51 %) were aware of at least six of the eight major infection control measures assessed. Most facilities (93.8 %, 30/32) lacked infection control committees and adequate supplies or equipment for infection control. Respondents were more likely to wash their hands if they had prior training on infection control (AOR = 2.71, 95 % CI: 1.03-7.16), had obtained at least 11 years of formal education (AOR = 3.30, 95 % CI: 1.44-7.54) and had reported to have acquired a nosocomial infection (AOR = 2.84, 95 % CI: 1.03-7.84). Healthcare workers are more likely to wash their hands if they have ever suffered from a nosocomial infection, received in-service training on infection control, were educated beyond ordinary level, or knew hand washing as one of the infection control measures. The Uganda Ministry of Health should provide regular in-service training in infection control measures and adequate necessary materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 194 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 22%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 21%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 58 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,919
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,599
of 7,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,109
of 262,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#120
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.