↓ Skip to main content

DNA vaccination for prostate cancer: key concepts and considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Nanotechnology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 161)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA vaccination for prostate cancer: key concepts and considerations
Published in
Cancer Nanotechnology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12645-015-0010-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Cole, Joanne McCaffrey, Ahlam A. Ali, Helen O. McCarthy

Abstract

While locally confined prostate cancer is associated with a low five year mortality rate, advanced or metastatic disease remains a major challenge for healthcare professionals to treat and is usually terminal. As such, there is a need for the development of new, efficacious therapies for prostate cancer. Immunotherapy represents a promising approach where the host's immune system is harnessed to mount an anti-tumour effect, and the licensing of the first prostate cancer specific immunotherapy in 2010 has opened the door for other immunotherapies to gain regulatory approval. Among these strategies DNA vaccines are an attractive option in terms of their ability to elicit a highly specific, potent and wide-sweeping immune response. Several DNA vaccines have been tested for prostate cancer and while they have demonstrated a good safety profile they have faced problems with low efficacy and immunogenicity compared to other immunotherapeutic approaches. This review focuses on the positive aspects of DNA vaccines for prostate cancer that have been assessed in preclinical and clinical trials thus far and examines the key considerations that must be employed to improve the efficacy and immunogenicity of these vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,151,789
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Nanotechnology
#34
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,115
of 263,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Nanotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them