You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pulse oximetry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0984-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amal Jubran |
| Abstract |
Pulse oximetry is universally used for monitoring patients in the critical care setting. This article updates the review on pulse oximetry that was published in 1999 in Critical Care. A summary of the recently developed multiwavelength pulse oximeters and their ability in detecting dyshemoglobins is provided. The impact of the latest signal processing techniques and reflectance technology on improving the performance of pulse oximeters during motion artifact and low perfusion conditions is critically examined. Finally, data regarding the effect of pulse oximetry on patient outcome are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 15% |
| United States | 18 | 11% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 104 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 23% |
| Scientists | 16 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 952 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 942 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 164 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 10% |
| Researcher | 75 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 7% |
| Other | 146 | 15% |
| Unknown | 327 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 270 | 28% |
| Engineering | 129 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 95 | 10% |
| Unknown | 358 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#289,588
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#139
of 6,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,494
of 397,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.