You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Squara, Dominique Rotcajg, Dominique Denjean, Philippe Estagnasie, Alain Brusset |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,884
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,429
of 122,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.