You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Equipment review: An appraisal of the LiDCO™plus method of measuring cardiac output
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc2852 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rupert M Pearse, Kashif Ikram, John Barry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 66% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,509
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,004
of 63,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.