You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Age and gender differences in disabling foot pain using different definitions of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-243 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hylton B Menz, Tiffany K Gill, Anne W Taylor, Catherine L Hill |
Abstract |
The Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) has been used to determine the prevalence of disabling foot pain in several studies, however there is some debate as to which case definition is most appropriate. The objective of this study was to explore age and gender differences in the proportion of people with disabling foot pain using three different case definitions of the MFPDI and for each individual MFPDI item. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#13,281,800
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,875
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,722
of 140,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#38
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.