You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Four aspects to make science open “by design” and not as an after-thought
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-015-0072-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Michael Hanke |
| Abstract |
Unrestricted dissemination of methodological developments in neuroimaging became the propelling force in advancing our understanding of brain function. However, despite such a rich legacy, it remains not uncommon to encounter software and datasets that are distributed under unnecessarily restricted terms, or that violate terms of third-party products (software or data). With this brief correspondence we would like to recapitulate four important aspects of scientific research practice, which should be taken into consideration as early as possible in the course of any project. Keeping these in check will help neuroimaging to stay at the forefront of the open science movement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 14% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 4% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 64% |
| Scientists | 14 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Librarian | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#851,852
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#107
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,074
of 275,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.