You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using co-occurrence network structure to extract synonymous gene and protein names from MEDLINE abstracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-6-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
AM Cohen, WR Hersh, C Dubay, K Spackman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 18 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,475,076
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,213
of 7,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,978
of 68,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.