You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changing perceptions of hunger on a high nutrient density diet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-9-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel Fuhrman, Barbara Sarter, Dale Glaser, Steve Acocella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 47 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 18% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#345,069
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#114
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#910
of 110,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.