↓ Skip to main content

Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13047-018-0264-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen A. Banwell, Maisie E. Paris, Shylie Mackintosh, Cylie M. Williams

Abstract

Flexible flat foot is a normal observation in typically developing children, however, some children with flat feet present with pain and impaired lower limb function. The challenge for health professionals is to identify when foot posture is outside of expected findings and may warrant intervention. Diagnoses of flexible flat foot is often based on radiographic or clinical measures, yet the validity and reliability of these measures for a paediatric population is not clearly understood. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate how paediatric foot posture is defined and measured within the literature, and if the psychometric properties of these measures support any given diagnoses. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, AMED, SportDiscus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were systematically searched in January 2017 for empirical studies where participants had diagnosed flexible flat foot and were aged 18 years or younger. Outcomes of interest were the foot posture measures and definitions used. Further articles were sought where cited in relation to the psychometric properties of the measures used. Of the 1101 unique records identified by the searches, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria involving 20 foot posture measures and 40 definitions of paediatric flexible flat foot. A further 18 citations were sought in relation to the psychometric properties of these measures. Three measures were deemed valid and reliable, the FPI-6 > + 6 for children aged three to 15 years, a Staheli arch index of > 1.07 for children aged three to six and ≥ 1.28 for children six to nine, and a Chippaux-Smirak index of > 62.7% in three to seven year olds, > 59% in six to nine year olds and ≥ 40% for children aged nine to 16 years. No further measures were found to be valid for the paediatric population. No universally accepted criteria for diagnosing paediatric flat foot was found within existing literature, and psychometric data for foot posture measures and definitions used was limited. The outcomes of this review indicate that the FPI - 6, Staheli arch index or Chippaux-Smirak index should be the preferred method of paediatric foot posture measurement in future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 314 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Other 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 132 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 15%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Engineering 9 3%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 146 46%