Title |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Headache and Pain, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10194-010-0232-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peer Carsten Tfelt-Hansen |
Abstract |
Calculating verisimilitude (or "truthlikeness") ad modum Popper is a quantitative alternative to the usual pros and cons in migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. The following items were evaluated: dilation of large cranial arteries during migraine; CGRP increase during migraine; migraine as a brain disorder; aura and migraine headache; brain stem activation during migraine; rCBF in migraine without aura; NO and pathophysiology of migraine; neurogenic inflammation and migraine; aura in cluster headache; and hypothalamic activation in cluster headache. It is concluded that verisimilitude calculations can be helpful when judging pathophysiological problems in migraine and cluster headache. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 31% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |