↓ Skip to main content

Clinical significance of three-dimensional skeleton-arterial model in the management of delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical significance of three-dimensional skeleton-arterial model in the management of delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures
Published in
BMC Surgery, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12893-018-0362-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi Zhou, Qiang Zhang, Wenhao Song, Dongsheng Zhou, Yu He

Abstract

Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures remains a challenging task for orthopedists because of malunion, fracture line absorption, and scar formation. Accurate osteotomy, interfragmentary release, and proper adaptation of plates are keys to successful surgery. Prevention of superior gluteal artery (SGA) injury induced by cleaning of the osteotylus and reduction of the sciatic notch is also important. Therefore, sufficient preoperative planning is essential. However, traditional planning methods do not readily provide direct visual and tactile feedback to surgeons. Rapid prototyping (RP) models have provided new opportunities in the preoperative planning of delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures. We hypothesized that a three-dimensional (3D) skeleton-arterial model would improve both preoperative planning in the management of fractures and arteries and intraoperative assistance during delayed reconstruction of complex acetabular fractures. Eight patients were enrolled in this study. Data on the skeleton and arteries were obtained from computed tomography and angiography scans and used to produce RP models. Preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative assistance were performed using these models as references. All 3D skeleton-arterial models were extremely accurate. Reduction and fixation were performed programmatically and smoothly, and management of the SGA was reliably executed according to a thorough preoperative plan. The mean surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were 224.4 min and 1250 ml, respectively. Among the eight patients, four underwent anatomic reduction and five had excellent functional outcomes at the final follow-up. No significant complications occurred. This 3D skeleton-arterial model is helpful for orthopedists in preoperative planning and intraoperative assistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Engineering 3 19%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,632,069
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#629
of 1,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,000
of 331,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.