You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prioritising public health: a qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lois C Orton, Ffion Lloyd-Williams, David C Taylor-Robinson, May Moonan, Martin O'Flaherty, Simon Capewell |
| Abstract |
The public health system in England is currently facing dramatic change. Renewed attention has recently been paid to the best approaches for tackling the health inequalities which remain entrenched within British society and across the globe. In order to consider the opportunities and challenges facing the new public health system in England, we explored the current experiences of those involved in decision making to reduce health inequalities, taking cardiovascular disease (CVD) as a case study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 21% |
| Researcher | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,631,404
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,011
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,482
of 139,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.