↓ Skip to main content

Distributed gene expression modelling for exploring variability in epigenetic function

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distributed gene expression modelling for exploring variability in epigenetic function
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1313-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Budden, Edmund J. Crampin

Abstract

Predictive gene expression modelling is an important tool in computational biology due to the volume of high-throughput sequencing data generated by recent consortia. However, the scope of previous studies has been restricted to a small set of cell-lines or experimental conditions due an inability to leverage distributed processing architectures for large, sharded data-sets. We present a distributed implementation of gene expression modelling using the MapReduce paradigm and prove that performance improves as a linear function of available processor cores. We then leverage the computational efficiency of this framework to explore the variability of epigenetic function across fifty histone modification data-sets from variety of cancerous and non-cancerous cell-lines. We demonstrate that the genome-wide relationships between histone modifications and mRNA transcription are lineage, tissue and karyotype-invariant, and that models trained on matched -omics data from non-cancerous cell-lines are able to predict cancerous expression with equivalent genome-wide fidelity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,981,606
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,135
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,710
of 314,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#22
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.