↓ Skip to main content

Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
535 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0055-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter B. Shull, Dana D. Damian

Abstract

Sensory impairments decrease quality of life and can slow or hinder rehabilitation. Small, computationally powerful electronics have enabled the recent development of wearable systems aimed to improve function for individuals with sensory impairments. The purpose of this review is to synthesize current haptic wearable research for clinical applications involving sensory impairments. We define haptic wearables as untethered, ungrounded body worn devices that interact with skin directly or through clothing and can be used in natural environments outside a laboratory. Results of this review are categorized by degree of sensory impairment. Total impairment, such as in an amputee, blind, or deaf individual, involves haptics acting as sensory replacement; partial impairment, as is common in rehabilitation, involves haptics as sensory augmentation; and no impairment involves haptics as trainer. This review found that wearable haptic devices improved function for a variety of clinical applications including: rehabilitation, prosthetics, vestibular loss, osteoarthritis, vision loss and hearing loss. Future haptic wearables development should focus on clinical needs, intuitive and multimodal haptic displays, low energy demands, and biomechanical compliance for long-term usage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 525 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 20%
Student > Master 94 18%
Researcher 62 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 73 14%
Unknown 116 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 179 33%
Computer Science 47 9%
Neuroscience 29 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 4%
Psychology 17 3%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 140 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,052,874
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#84
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,067
of 269,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.