You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards an integrated clinical framework for patient with shoulder pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Physiotherapy, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40945-018-0050-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Ristori, Simone Miele, Giacomo Rossettini, Erica Monaldi, Diego Arceri, Marco Testa |
| Abstract |
Shoulder pain (SP) represents a common musculoskeletal condition that requires physical therapy care. Along the years, the usual evaluation strategies based on clinical tests and diagnostic imaging has been challenged. Clinical tests appear unable to clearly identify the structures that generated pain and interpretation of diagnostic imaging is still controversial. The current patho-anatomical diagnostic categories have demonstrated poor reliability and seem inadequate for the SP treatment. The present paper aims to (1) describe the different proposals of clinical approach to SP currently available in the literature; to (2) integrate these proposals in a single framework in order to help the management of SP. The proposed clinical framework, based on a bio-psychosocial vision of health, integrates symptoms characteristics, pain mechanisms and expectations, preferences and psychosocial factors of patients that may guide physiotherapist to make a diagnostic triage and to choose the right treatment for the individual patient. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 17 | 15% |
| Italy | 10 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 84% |
| Scientists | 14 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 253 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 96 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 106 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#545,700
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physiotherapy
#9
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,876
of 345,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physiotherapy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them