You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mortality and morbidity in community-acquired sepsis in European pediatric intensive care units: a prospective cohort study from the European Childhood Life-threatening Infectious Disease Study (EUCLIDS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2052-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Navin P. Boeddha, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Gertjan J. Driessen, Jethro A. Herberg, Irene Rivero-Calle, Miriam Cebey-López, Daniela S. Klobassa, Ria Philipsen, Ronald de Groot, David P. Inwald, Simon Nadel, Stéphane Paulus, Eleanor Pinnock, Fatou Secka, Suzanne T. Anderson, Rachel S. Agbeko, Christoph Berger, Colin G. Fink, Enitan D. Carrol, Werner Zenz, Michael Levin, Michiel van der Flier, Federico Martinón-Torres, Jan A. Hazelzet, Marieke Emonts, on behalf of the EUCLIDS consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| Mexico | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,445,477
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,125
of 6,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,825
of 344,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#52
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.