You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Better reporting for better research: a checklist for reproducibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12868-015-0177-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amye Kenall, Scott Edmunds, Laurie Goodman, Liz Bal, Louisa Flintoft, Daniel R Shanahan, Tim Shipley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,775,487
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#38
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,918
of 275,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.