↓ Skip to main content

Association between the use of a stylet in endotracheal intubation and postoperative arytenoid dislocation: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between the use of a stylet in endotracheal intubation and postoperative arytenoid dislocation: a case-control study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12871-018-0521-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingeer Wu, Le Shen, Yuelun Zhang, Xiuhua Zhang, Yuguang Huang

Abstract

Arytenoid dislocation (AD) is a rare but severe complication after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. We conducted a case-control study at Peking Union Medical College Hospital to identify risk factors associated with AD, including the use of an intubation stylet. Patients who experienced AD were matched 1:3 with controls based on gender, age and type of surgery. Multiple conditional logistic regression was performed to determine associations between potential risk factors and AD. Twenty-six AD cases were retrospectively identified from 2004 through 2016. On average, arytenoid dislocation occurred in 2 cases per year, with an incidence of 0.904/100,000 (approximately 0.01%). The 26 patients who experienced AD and 78 matched control patients were enrolled in this study. All enrolled patients underwent endotracheal intubation, and a stylet was used for intubation for 38.5% (10/26) of the AD patients and 64.1% (50/78) of the controls (OR = 0.23, 0.07-0.74). A higher incidence of AD was significantly associated with longer duration of operation (OR = 1.74, 1.23-2.47). The use of an intubation stylet for endotracheal intubation appears to protect against AD. Prolonged operation time increases the risk of AD. These factors should be considered when assessing the risks of AD associated with endotracheal intubation and in efforts to avoid this complication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,098,091
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#377
of 1,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,071
of 331,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.