↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Blogs Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13033-018-0209-z
Pubmed ID
29881449
Authors

Ingrid Femdal

Abstract

Current mental health policy emphasizes the importance of community-based service delivery for people with mental health problems to encompass personal recovery. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals construct the place's influence on personal recovery in community mental health services. This is a qualitative, interpretive study based on ten individual, semi-structured interviews with users and professionals, respectively. A discourse analysis inspired by the work of Foucault was used to analyze the interviews. The findings show how place can be constructed as a potential for and as a barrier against recovery. Constructions of the aim of the services matter when choosing a place for the services. Further, constructions of user-professional relationships and flexibility are important in the constructions of an appropriate place for the services. The aim of the service, the user-professional relationship, and flexibility in choosing place were essential in the participants' constructions. To find "the right place" for mental health services was constructed as context-sensitive and complex processes of assessment and co-determination.Trial registration The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, Norway (REK-Midt 2011/2057).

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 33%
Psychology 2 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,974,369
of 13,020,439 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#147
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,978
of 271,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,020,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.