↓ Skip to main content

Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation—effects on physical function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation—effects on physical function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: a substudy of the NONSEDA trial
Published in
Trials, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0856-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helene Korvenius Nedergaard, Hanne Irene Jensen, Jørgen T. Lauridsen, Gisela Sjøgaard, Palle Toft

Abstract

Critically ill patients rapidly loose much of their muscle mass and strength. This can be attributed to prolonged admission, prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased mortality, and it can have a negative impact on the degree of independence and quality of life. In the NONSEDA trial we randomize critically ill patients to non-sedation or sedation with a daily wake-up trial during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. It has never been assessed whether non-sedation affects physical function. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial on physical function after discharge from intensive care unit. Investigator-initiated, randomized, clinical, parallel-group, superiority trial, including 700 patients in total, with a substudy concerning 200 of these patients. Inclusion criteria will be intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with expected duration of mechanical ventilation >24 h. Exclusion criteria will be patients with severe head trauma, coma at admission or status epilepticus, patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, patients with PaO2/FiO2<9 where sedation might be necessary to ensure sufficient oxygenation or placing the patient in a prone position. The experimental intervention will be non-sedation supplemented with pain management during mechanical ventilation. The control intervention will be sedation with a daily wake-up trial. The co-primary outcome will be quality of life regarding physical function (SF-36, physical component) and degree of independence in activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and this will be assessed for all 700 patients participating in the NONSEDA trial. The secondary outcomes, which will be assessed for the subpopulation of 200 NONSEDA patients in the trial site, Kolding, will be 6-min walking distance, handgrip strength, muscle size (ultrasonographic measurement of the rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area) and biomechanical data on lower extremity function (maximal voluntary contraction, rate of force development and endurance). This study is the first to investigate the effect of no sedation during critical illness on physical function. If an effect is found, it will add important information on how to prevent muscle weakness following critical illness. The study has been approved by the relevant scientific ethics committee and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02034942 , 9 January 2014).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Master 23 11%
Other 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 60 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 22%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 66 31%