↓ Skip to main content

Anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide are not equivalent as predictors of severe outcomes in patients with recent-onset polyarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide are not equivalent as predictors of severe outcomes in patients with recent-onset polyarthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/ar1719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilles Boire, Pierre Cossette, Artur J de Brum-Fernandes, Patrick Liang, Théophile Niyonsenga, Zhijie J Zhou, Nathalie Carrier, Claude Daniel, Henri-A Ménard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Master 5 19%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,263
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,853
of 85,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.