↓ Skip to main content

DENSE: efficient and prior knowledge-driven discovery of phenotype-associated protein functional modules

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DENSE: efficient and prior knowledge-driven discovery of phenotype-associated protein functional modules
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willam Hendrix, Andrea M Rocha, Kanchana Padmanabhan, Alok Choudhary, Kathleen Scott, James R Mihelcic, Nagiza F Samatova

Abstract

Identifying cellular subsystems that are involved in the expression of a target phenotype has been a very active research area for the past several years. In this paper, cellular subsystem refers to a group of genes (or proteins) that interact and carry out a common function in the cell. Most studies identify genes associated with a phenotype on the basis of some statistical bias, others have extended these statistical methods to analyze functional modules and biological pathways for phenotype-relatedness. However, a biologist might often have a specific question in mind while performing such analysis and most of the resulting subsystems obtained by the existing methods might be largely irrelevant to the question in hand. Arguably, it would be valuable to incorporate biologist's knowledge about the phenotype into the algorithm. This way, it is anticipated that the resulting subsytems would not only be related to the target phenotype but also contain information that the biologist is likely to be interested in.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Hungary 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 24 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Computer Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 26 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,720,232
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#601
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,395
of 140,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.