↓ Skip to main content

Isoform-specific deletion of PKM2 constrains tumor initiation in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer & Metabolism, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isoform-specific deletion of PKM2 constrains tumor initiation in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma
Published in
Cancer & Metabolism, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40170-018-0179-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Talya L. Dayton, Vasilena Gocheva, Kathryn M. Miller, Arjun Bhutkar, Caroline A. Lewis, Roderick T. Bronson, Matthew G. Vander Heiden, Tyler Jacks

Abstract

Alternative splicing of the Pkm gene product generates the PKM1 and PKM2 isoforms of the glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase. PKM2 expression is associated with embryogenesis, tissue regeneration, and cancer. PKM2 is also the pyruvate kinase isoform expressed in most wild-type adult tissues, with PKM1 restricted primarily to skeletal muscle, heart, and brain. To interrogate the functional requirement for PKM2 during tumor initiation in an autochthonous mouse model for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), we used a conditional Pkm2 allele (Pkm2 fl ) to abolish PKM2 expression. PKM2 deletion slowed tumor onset but did not abrogate eventual tumor outgrowth. PKM2-null sarcoma cells expressed PKM1 with tumors containing a high number of infiltrating PKM2 expressing stromal cells. End-stage PKM2-null tumors showed increased proliferation compared to tumors with a wild-type Pkm2 allele, and tumor metabolite analysis revealed metabolic changes associated with PKM2 loss. While PKM2 is not required for soft tissue sarcoma growth, PKM2 expression may facilitate initiation of this tumor type. Because these data differ from what has been observed in other cancer models where PKM2 has been deleted, they argue that the consequences of PKM2 loss during tumor initiation are dependent on the tumor type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,615,073
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Cancer & Metabolism
#103
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,029
of 331,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer & Metabolism
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.