↓ Skip to main content

Strength and hypertrophy responses to constant and decreasing rest intervals in trained men using creatine supplementation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strength and hypertrophy responses to constant and decreasing rest intervals in trained men using creatine supplementation
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-8-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tácito P Souza-Junior, Jeffrey M Willardson, Richard Bloomer, Richard D Leite, Steven J Fleck, Paulo R Oliveira, Roberto Simão

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to compare strength and hypertrophy responses to resistance training programs that instituted constant rest intervals (CI) and decreasing rest intervals (DI) between sets over the course of eight weeks by trained men who supplemented with creatine monohydrate (CR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 20%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 57 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,248,175
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#283
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,191
of 449,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#264
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.