You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Innovation in mental health services: what are the key components of success?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen Brooks, David Pilgrim, Anne Rogers |
Abstract |
Service development innovation in health technology and practice is viewed as a pressing need within the field of mental health yet is relatively poorly understood. Macro-level theories have been criticised for their limited explanatory power and they may not be appropriate for understanding local and fine-grained uncertainties of services and barriers to the sustainability of change. This study aimed to identify contextual influences inhibiting or promoting the acceptance and integration of innovations in mental health services in both National Health Service (NHS) and community settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
Researcher | 22 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 22% |
Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 20% |
Psychology | 26 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,977,342
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#756
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,804
of 145,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.