↓ Skip to main content

An open-label, flexible dose adaptive study evaluating the efficacy of vortioxetine in subjects with panic disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An open-label, flexible dose adaptive study evaluating the efficacy of vortioxetine in subjects with panic disorder
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12991-018-0190-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anish Shah, Joanne Northcutt

Abstract

Despite the current treatments available for panic disorder (PD), as many as one-third of patients have persistent and treatment-resistant panic attacks. Vortioxetine is an approved medicine for major depressive disorder and has been shown to have anxiolytic properties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its efficacy and safety in an adult population with a diagnosis of PD. The study design was open label with flexible dose strategies (5, 10, or 20 mg) with a treatment period of 10 weeks. 27 male and female subjects aged between 18 and 60 years, who met DSM-IV criteria for PD with or without agoraphobia, or who had a Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) score > 8 at baseline were enrolled. Statistical significance was established by the Student's T test. A statistically significant decrease in the occurrence of panic attacks was measured with the PDSS with vortioxetine. In addition, a moderate improvement in the quality of life and no significant side effects were observed using the Quality-of-Life Scale and Monitoring of Side Effects Scale, respectively. These results provide some support for the use of vortioxetine in the management of panic disorder.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID#: NCT02395510. Registered March 23, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02395510.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Psychology 5 12%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Linguistics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 40%