↓ Skip to main content

MRgFUS for Uterine Myomas: Safety, Effectiveness and Pathogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MRgFUS for Uterine Myomas: Safety, Effectiveness and Pathogenesis
Published in
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-5736-2-s1-a1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Kurashvili, Alexander Stepanov, Elena Kulabuchova, Olga Batarshina

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#30
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,072
of 368,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.