↓ Skip to main content

A community-based peer support service for persons with severe mental illness in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A community-based peer support service for persons with severe mental illness in China
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12888-018-1763-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunge Fan, Ning Ma, Liang Ma, Wei Xu, J. Steven Lamberti, Eric D. Caine

Abstract

Peer support services for patients with severe mental illness (SMI) originated from Western countries and have become increasingly popular during the past twenty years. The aim of this paper is to describe a peer service model and its implementation in China, including the model's feasibility and sustainability. A peer support service was developed in four Chinese communities. Implementation, feasibility and sustainability were assessed across five domains: Service process, service contents, peer training and supervision, service satisfaction, and service perceived benefit. Service process: 214 peer support activities were held between July 2013 and June 2016. No adverse events occurred during three years. Each activity ranged from 40 to 120 min; most were conducted in a community rehabilitation center or community health care center. Service content: Activities focused on eight primary topics-daily life skills, social skills, knowledge of mental disorders, entertainment, fine motor skill practice, personal perceptions, healthy life style support, emotional support. Peer training and supervision: Intensive training was provided for all peers before they started to provide services. Regular supervision and continued training were provided thereafter; online supervision supplemented face to face meetings. Service satisfaction: Nineteen consumers (79.2%) (χ2(1) = 12.76, p < 0.001) were satisfied with the peers and 17 consumers (70.8%) (χ2(1) = 8.05, p = 0.005) expressed a strong desire to continue to participate in the service. Fourteen caregivers (93.3%) (χ2(1) = 11.27, p = 0.001) wanted the patients to continue to organize or participate in the service. Service perceived benefit: Six peers (85.7%) (χ2(1) = 3.57, p = 0.059) reported an improvement of working skills. Ten consumers (41.7%) (χ2(1) = 0.05, p = 0.827) reported better social communication skills. Six caregivers (40%) (χ2(1) = 1.67, p = 0.197) observed patients' increase in social communication skills, five (33.3%) (χ2(1) = 1.67, p = 0.197) found their own mood had been improved. Peer support services for patients with SMI can be sustainably implemented within Chinese communities without adverse events that jeopardize safety and patient stability. Suggestions for future service development include having professionals give increased levels of support to peers at the beginning of a new program. A culturally consistent peer service manual, including peer role definition, peer training curriculum, and supervision methods, should be developed to help implement the service smoothly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 39 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Psychology 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 43 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,436,838
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,947
of 5,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,898
of 344,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#97
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.