↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing functional connectivity patterns during saliva swallows in different head positions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing functional connectivity patterns during saliva swallows in different head positions
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0049-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iva Jestrović, James L. Coyle, Ervin Sejdić

Abstract

The anatomical rationale and efficacy of the chin tuck in improving airway protection for some people with swallowing disorders have been well researched and established. However, there are still open questions regarding whether brain activity for swallowing control is altered while performing this chin-tuck maneuver. In this study, we collected EEG signals from 55 healthy adults while swallowing in the neutral and chin-tuck head positions. The time-frequency based synchrony measure was used to form brain networks. We investigated both the small-world properties of these brain networks and differences among the constructed brain networks for the two head positions during swallowing tasks. We showed that brain networks for swallowing in both head positions exhibit small-world properties. Furthermore, we showed that swallowing in the chin-tuck head position affects brain networks in the Alpha and Gamma frequency bands. According to these results, we can tell that the parameter of head position should be considered in future investigations which utilize EEG signals during swallowing activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 31%
Engineering 5 14%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,690,968
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#775
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,789
of 263,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.