↓ Skip to main content

In silico identification of drug target pathways in breast cancer subtypes using pathway cross-talk inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In silico identification of drug target pathways in breast cancer subtypes using pathway cross-talk inhibition
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12967-018-1535-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Cava, Gloria Bertoli, Isabella Castiglioni

Abstract

Despite great development in genome and proteome high-throughput methods, treatment failure is a critical point in the management of most solid cancers, including breast cancer (BC). Multiple alternative mechanisms upon drug treatment are involved to offset therapeutic effects, eventually causing drug resistance or treatment failure. Here, we optimized a computational method to discover novel drug target pathways in cancer subtypes using pathway cross-talk inhibition (PCI). The in silico method is based on the detection and quantification of the pathway cross-talk for distinct cancer subtypes. From a BC data set of The Cancer Genome Atlas, we have identified different networks of cross-talking pathways for different BC subtypes, validated using an independent BC dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus. Then, we predicted in silico the effects of new or approved drugs on different BC subtypes by silencing individual or combined subtype-derived pathways with the aim to find new potential drugs or more effective synergistic combinations of drugs. Overall, we identified a set of new potential drug target pathways for distinct BC subtypes on which therapeutic agents could synergically act showing antitumour effects and impacting on cross-talk inhibition. We believe that in silico methods based on PCI could offer valuable approaches to identifying more tailored and effective treatments in particular in heterogeneous cancer diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Engineering 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,009,334
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,007
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,657
of 329,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#26
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.