You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whale phylogeny and rapid radiation events revealed using novel retroposed elements and their flanking sequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-11-314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuo Chen, Shixia Xu, Kaiya Zhou, Guang Yang |
| Abstract |
A diversity of hypotheses have been proposed based on both morphological and molecular data to reveal phylogenetic relationships within the order Cetacea (dolphins, porpoises, and whales), and great progress has been made in the past two decades. However, there is still some controversy concerning relationships among certain cetacean taxa such as river dolphins and delphinoid species, which needs to be further addressed with more markers in an effort to address unresolved portions of the phylogeny. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 30% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 61% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,578
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,322
of 152,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#34
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.