↓ Skip to main content

Aripiprazole for the treatment of tic disorders in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aripiprazole for the treatment of tic disorders in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0504-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun-Song Yang, Hong Huang, Ling-Li Zhang, Cai-Rong Zhu, Qin Guo

Abstract

Tic disorders (TDs) are common neuropsychiatric disorders in children. Typical antipsychotics, such as haloperidol and pimozide have been prescribed to control tic symptoms as first-line agents. However, adverse effects have led to the use of newer atypical antipsychotics. Aripiprazole is one of alternatives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole for children with TDs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and control studies evaluating aripiprazole for children with tic disorders were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Cochrane Central, four Chinese database and relevant reference lists. Quality assessment referred to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Twelve studies involving 935 participants were included. The general quality of included studies was poor. Only one study used placebo as a control and others used positive drug controls. Participants were aged between 4 and 18 years. The period of treatment ranged from 8 to 12 weeks. Seven studies (N = 600 patients) used the YGTSS scale as the outcome measurement, and there was no significant difference in reduction of the total YGTSS score between the aripiprazole and positive control groups (MD = -0.48, 95 % CI [-6.22, 5.26], P = 0.87, I(2) = 87 %). Meta-analysis of four of the studies (N = 285 patients) that compared aripiprazole with haloperidol showed that there was no significant difference in reduction of the total YGTSS score (MD = 2.50, 95 % CI [-6.93, 11.92], P = 0.60, I(2) = 88 %). Meta-analysis of two studies (N = 255 patients) that compared aripiprazole with tiapride showed that there was no significant difference in reduction of the total YGTSS score (MD = -3.15, 95 % CI [-11.38, 5.09], P = 0.45, I(2) = 86 %). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 studies. Drowsiness (5.1 %-58.1 %), increased appetite (3.2 %-25.8 %), nausea (2 %-18.8 %) and headache (2 %-16.1 %) were common AEs. In conclusion, aripiprazole appears to be a promising therapy for children with TDs. Further well-conducted RCTs are required to confirm this issue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 24 32%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 37%
Psychology 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,381,432
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,255
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,698
of 265,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.