↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1551-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie Haverkamp, Hylke JF Brenkman, Maarten FJ Seesing, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Misha DP Luyer, Grard AP Nieuwenhuijzen, Bas PL Wijnhoven, Jan JB van Lanschot, Wobbe O de Steur, Henk H Hartgrink, Jan HMB Stoot, Karel WE Hulsewé, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Jeroen E Rütter, Ewout A Kouwenhoven, Marc J van Det, Donald L van der Peet, Freek Daams, Werner A Draaisma, Ivo AMJ Broeders, Henk F van Stel, Miangela M Lacle, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, LOGICA study group

Abstract

For gastric cancer patients, surgical resection with en-bloc lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of curative treatment. Open gastrectomy has long been the preferred surgical approach worldwide. However, this procedure is associated with considerable morbidity. Several meta-analyses have shown an advantage in short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy compared to open procedures, with similar oncologic outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether the results of these Asian studies can be extrapolated to the Western population. In this trial from the Netherlands, patients with resectable gastric cancer will be randomized to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. The study is a non-blinded, multicenter, prospectively randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients (≥18 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0-3b, M0) gastric adenocarcinoma and European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 are eligible to participate in the study after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 210) will be included in one of the ten participating Dutch centers and are randomized to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. The primary outcome is postoperative hospital stay (days). Secondary outcome parameters include postoperative morbidity and mortality, oncologic outcomes, readmissions, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. In this randomized controlled trial laparoscopic and open gastrectomy are compared in patients with resectable gastric cancer. It is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will result in a faster recovery of the patient and a shorter hospital stay. Secondly, it is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will be associated with a lower postoperative morbidity, less readmissions, higher cost-effectiveness, better postoperative quality of life, but with similar mortality and oncologic outcomes, compared to open gastrectomy. The study started on 1 December 2014. Inclusion and follow-up will take 3 and 5 years respectively. Short-term results will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient. NCT02248519.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,556,454
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,452
of 8,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,947
of 264,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#62
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.