↓ Skip to main content

INA-RESPOND: a multi-centre clinical research network in Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
INA-RESPOND: a multi-centre clinical research network in Indonesia
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12961-015-0024-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Karyana, Herman Kosasih, Gina Samaan, Emiliana Tjitra, Abu Tholib Aman, Bachti Alisjahbana, Fatmawati, M. Hussein Gasem, Mansyur Arif, Pratiwi Sudarmono, Suharto, Tuti P. Merati, Clifford Lane, Siswanto, Sophia Siddiqui

Abstract

Nationally representative observational and translational research is needed to address the public health challenges in Indonesia due to the geographic disparity, recently decentralized health system, and diverse infectious disease priorities. To accomplish this, the Indonesian Ministry of Health in collaboration with the US National Institute of Health has established INA-RESPOND (Indonesia Research Partnership on Infectious Disease) - a clinical research network comprising 9 referral hospitals, 7 medical faculties, and 2 research centres across Indonesia. The network provides a forum to conduct research at a national scale and to address scientific questions that would be difficult to address in smaller research settings. Further, it is currently conducting multi-centre research on the etiologies of fever, sepsis, and tuberculosis. There are opportunities to leverage existing network resources for other public health research needs. INA-RESPOND is an Indonesian-led network in a country with diverse population groups and public health needs which is poised to collaborate with researchers, universities, donors, and industry worldwide. This paper describes the network and its goals and values, as well as the management structure, process for collaboration, and future vision.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,879,998
of 5,422,321 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#307
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,529
of 189,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,422,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.