↓ Skip to main content

The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
705 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition
Published in
Gut Pathogens, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina Markowiak, Katarzyna Śliżewska

Abstract

Along with the intensive development of methods of livestock breeding, breeders' expectations are growing concerning feed additives that would guarantee such results as accelerating growth rate, protection of health from pathogenic infections and improvement of other production parameters such as: absorption of feed and quality of meat, milk, eggs. The main reason for their application would be a strive to achieve some beneficial effects comparable to those of antibiotic-based growth stimulators, banned on 01 January 2006. High hopes are being associated with the use of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Used mainly for maintenance of the equilibrium of the intestinal microbiota of livestock, they turn out to be an effective method in fight against pathogens posing a threat for both animals and consumers. This paper discusses definitions of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Criteria that have to be met by those kinds of formulas are also presented. The paper offers a list of the most commonly used probiotics and prebiotics and some examples of their combinations in synbiotic formulas used in animal feeding. Examples of available study results on the effect of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on animal health are also summarised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 705 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 13%
Student > Bachelor 87 12%
Researcher 73 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 90 13%
Unknown 266 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 53 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 2%
Other 78 11%
Unknown 288 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,455,996
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#56
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,537
of 329,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.