↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of antenatal care attendance among women residing in highly disadvantaged communities in northern Jordan: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of antenatal care attendance among women residing in highly disadvantaged communities in northern Jordan: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Reproductive Health, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12978-018-0542-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heba H. Hijazi, Mohammad S. Alyahya, Amer M. Sindiani, Rola S. Saqan, Abdulhakeem M. Okour

Abstract

One of the major reproductive health challenges among disadvantaged populations is to provide pregnant women with the necessary antenatal care (ANC). In this study, we suggest applying an integrated conceptual framework aimed at ascertaining the extent to which attendance at ANC clinics may be attributed to individual determinants or to the quality of the care received. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from a sample of 831 women residing in nine sub-districts in three northern governorates of Jordan and designated according to national categorization as persistent poverty pockets. All of the sampled women were recruited from public maternal and child health centers and interviewed using a structured pre-tested survey. This tool covered certain predictors, ranging from the user's attributes, including predisposing, enabling, and need factors, to the essential components of the experience of care. These components assessed the quality of ANC in terms of five elements: woman-provider relations, technical management, information exchange, continuity of care, and appropriate constellation of services. Adequate ANC content was assessed in relation to the frequency of antenatal visits and the time of each visit. The results of multivariate logistic regression analyses show that the use of ANC facilities is affected by various factors related to the quality of service delivery. These include receiving information and education on ANC during clinic visits (OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 4.9-16.9), providing pregnant women with opportunities for dialogue and health talks (OR = 7.2; 95% CI = 4.1-12.8), having scheduled follow-up appointments (OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 3.5-12.0), and offering dignified and respectful care (OR = 5.7; 95% CI = 2.5-13.1). At the individual level, our findings have identified a woman's education level (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), desire for the pregnancy (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1-2.7), and living in a district served by an ANC clinic (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.3-8.1) as determinants affecting ANC utilization. Taking women's experiences of ANC as a key metric for reporting the quality of the care is more likely to lead to increased utilization of ANC services by women in highly disadvantaged communities. Our findings suggest that the degree to which women feel that they are respected, informed, and engaged in their care has potential favorable implications for ANC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 368 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 18%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Researcher 27 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Student > Postgraduate 16 4%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 141 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 90 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 14%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 151 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,829,019
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#577
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,776
of 329,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.