You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early rehabilitation in sepsis: a prospective randomised controlled trial investigating functional and physiological outcomes The i-PERFORM Trial(Protocol Article)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-11-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geetha Kayambu, Robert J Boots, Jennifer D Paratz |
| Abstract |
Patients with sepsis syndromes in comparison to general intensive care patients can have worse outcomes for physical function, quality of life and survival. Early intensive care rehabilitation can improve the outcome in general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, however no investigations have specifically looked at patients with sepsis syndromes. The 'i-PERFORM Trial' will investigate if early targeted rehabilitation is both safe and effective in patients with sepsis syndromes admitted to ICU. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 16% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2011.
All research outputs
#6,806,149
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#247
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,820
of 141,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.